Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 26, 2017, 12:53:47 AM
75132 Posts in 1768 Topics by 359 Members
Latest Member: nic4real
Home Help Login Register
TalkLeft Discussion Forums  |  Topics  |  Duke Players' Discredited Sexual Assault Case  |  Archived Duke Players' Discredited Sexual Assault Case Topics  |  IMHO is wrong again 0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] Go Down Print
Author Topic: IMHO is wrong again  (Read 17878 times)
inmyhumbleopinion
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4758

"I thought he was banned permanently too" OM OM OM


WWW
Re: IMHO is wrong again
« Reply #60 on: June 04, 2007, 01:31:15 PM »

Yes, what was used to indict Reade and Collin?

It had to be the 4/4 "lineup".

If anyone has any idea what else Himan and Gottlieb could have used to point to Reade and Collin for the GJ, I'd love to hear it.

Those descriptions in Gottlieb's notes were spot on.
Logged

QT
wumhenry
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1450


Re: IMHO is wrong again
« Reply #61 on: June 04, 2007, 01:43:33 PM »

Yes, what was used to indict Reade and Collin?

It had to be the 4/4 "lineup".

If anyone has any idea what else Himan and Gottlieb could have used to point to Reade and Collin for the GJ, I'd love to hear it.

Those descriptions in Gottlieb's notes were spot on.

Yeah, but those notes were manufactured after the indictments. LOL
Logged
inmyhumbleopinion
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4758

"I thought he was banned permanently too" OM OM OM


WWW
Re: IMHO is wrong again
« Reply #62 on: June 04, 2007, 01:46:56 PM »


I'll agree with IMHO.
Using the analogy "multiple choice test with no wrong answers" is not a good description.
It was not multiple choice and there was the opportunity for wrong answers.


IMHO is wrong again   right
Logged

QT
vegas
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 636


Re: IMHO is wrong again
« Reply #63 on: June 04, 2007, 01:49:14 PM »

Call it multiple choice, true-false, or essay. It doesn't matter. Mangum couldn't give a wrong answer. A wrong answer was ignored. The people giving her the grade were going to pass her no matter what. Heck, how many tries did they give her to take the test?
Looks like Crystal failed when she picked out the Ross guy a couple of times.  The wrong answer was ignored,  which shows intent to harm.to me, at least.  Briscoe, Green and the Louie never engage in these practices.
Logged
QuadDog
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 88


Re: IMHO is wrong again
« Reply #64 on: June 04, 2007, 02:06:56 PM »

Yes, what was used to indict Reade and Collin?

It had to be the 4/4 "lineup".

If anyone has any idea what else Himan and Gottlieb could have used to point to Reade and Collin for the GJ, I'd love to hear it.

Those descriptions in Gottlieb's notes were spot on.
Gottlieb didn't take notes.
Logged
LTC8K9
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3343


Professional Lunkhead


Re: IMHO is wrong again
« Reply #65 on: June 04, 2007, 02:09:34 PM »

Quote
Those descriptions in Gottlieb's notes were spot on.

Gottlieb couldn't have had those descriptions on 3/16 for numerous reasons, as you well know.

Besides, now you'd have to believe that Crystal could describe her attackers "spot on" on 3/16, yet is unable to pick out photos given multiple tries.

This is of course a typical joke reply by Immy.
Logged
TalkLeft
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 870


WWW
Re: IMHO is wrong again
« Reply #66 on: June 04, 2007, 02:25:10 PM »

We don't write threads about other posters here.  This thread should never have been started. It's closing and moving to the archives.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Advertise Here